Another opinions as fact stuff

One deviant did his version of the Walt Disney Controversy Meme and part of his description said that he doesn't like 90% of Disney films and I said to him an hour ago: "Just out of curiosity, why did you do the meme in the first place if you don't like 90% of the Disney films? I respect your opinions on the other hand."

He responded to me nearly a half hour ago: "I think I wrote why.

Once I run hither on the internet and looking for something interesting, and I came across this meme. I thought and thought, and then I thought. Yes, and why not?

Besides, I thought that in this world, and especially in the United States, you are WAAAAY too tolerant of these films. I decided that my diametrically opposite point of view can make at least some variety to the monotonous mush."

To which I responded six minutes later: "Now that you've explained why you did this, I just don't think it would be a good idea to do a meme like this one if you don't like 90% of these films. If I were you, I wouldn't do a meme like this due to the dislike of 90% Disney films. It doesn't make any sense to do this if you don't like 90% of them and it doesn't work well. It's just your opinion that people are way too tolerant of these films or that it is monotonous mush."

Then this gets too far: "Sorry buddy, but that's nonsense. I believe that people can express their opinion, regardless of what others think. Especially if it is a negative opinion against almost all Disney movies. This is not opinion, it is a fact. People ignore the flaws, failures, and just hack, by pushing stupid theories thus attempting to explain these drawbacks. But for some unknown reasons they bashing and criticizing the other movies because of the same drawbacks."

My response to this: "It's not nonsense. I don't think it was a good idea for you to do this meme if you don't like 90% of these films. It's an opinion and yes, there are flaws in them but people don't ignore them and yes, it's your own opinion that you don't like these films. Don't give me that "not an opinion, but a fact" stuff because you can't use your opinions as facts. Sorry, but it's true and taste is subjective. Why don't you just move on and realise that you shouldn't use opinions as facts, OK?"

You know what he said after this: "HAHAHA... I knew that you're damn troll! Go and write trolling elsewhere, and do not waste my time!", which I responded with this: "I don't troll people. Never did, never will. You on the other hand are using opinions as facts because that's not a good thing at all."

I mean why do people have to use their opinions as facts and why do their own version of controversy memes if they don't like 90% of their stuff?

Here's the link: comments.deviantart.com/1/6357…

UPDATE (08-10-2016; 0830 BST): He's at it again - "If you're not a troll people, then why do you falsify the facts? Damn people create damn memes, where they write tons of bullshit, in which they ignore the shortcomings of their favorite movies, games, television shows, books, and so on, but happily bashing the other works that have the same disadvantages. Look around you, look the other memes. You will see that what I wrote is a real fact, not an opinion. I will not write examples, just look for yourself and you will see."

My response: "Again, I never troll people and yes, you can't use opinions as facts. It's not the right thing to do."

This is why I don't like it when people use their opinions as facts.

UPDATE (08-10-2016; 0834 BST): Again with this - "Did you read my previous reply? Because I don't think you did. I have a feeling that you just replied without even reading. You note: I never !!! I never build my point of view without facts! "

My response: "I have read your reply. People who like these stuff don't ignore these flaws. It's your opinion that it's monotomous mush."

UPDATE (08-10-2016; 0846 BST) - His response: "Ah, I'm done with this conservation. You repeat to me the same answer for the fifth time. If you want to annoy me, you're not far from it, kid!"

My comment to him: "I'm not annoying you. You're annoying me because I know you can't use your opinions as facts plus it's not a fact but an opinion.

Don't continue with "it's a fact, not an opinion" because all this conversation reminds me of a journal entry I did a few weeks ago: adrenalinerush1996.deviantart.…"

What should I do if he responds back? Should I block him like I did with Swampyfan or something else because I don't like it when people use their opinions as facts and attack people who call them out for using them as facts.

UPDATE (08-10-2016; 0900 BST) - His response to this: "Clear. I see that you have posted the journal to throw mud at me. Well, keep up the "good" work." and his comment to this journal entry: "Very beautiful. Right in the style of Fyodor Dostoevsky. Bravo."

I hid the latter comment with this: "You shouldn't have responded this in the first place." and his response: "I said responded you normaly, but you started biting and panic. I said to you that I never using my opinions as a facts bullshit. Any opinion should be supported by the facts, and these facts speak about it.

Do not hide my comments by the way! I am not hiding yours!"

Response: "Actually, you're wrong. Opinions cannot be supported by facts, hence people shouldn't use opinions as facts. You really are criticising my stuff."

His response: "In where am I criticized your stuff?"

My response: "Criticising my "not using opinions as facts" comments, that is."

Back to the former comment, my response: "You really like to antagonise people who call you put for using your opinions as facts."

I've hidden his comments on this journal entry but they will be featured on this.

UPDATE (08-10-2016, 0934 BST): His response to my response on the former: "And really like to antagonise people who have a diametrically opposite point of view."

My response: "You know what, just move on."

I've decided not to hide his recent comments for this journal entry because there is too much comments from him that I need to put up on this journal entry, so I'll focus on the former.

UPDATE (08-10-2016; 0940 BST): He hit back with this: "No, I will not move on, because you do not even understand my words, and began to pour mud at me on an empty reason!"

My response: "You should move on because I've had enough with this. You said you were done with this conversation several minutes ago. Don't ever respond back to my journal entry and you've heard the last from me."

I do have a reason why I've done this. When I read his description, he said that he despises almost all the Disney movies and 90 percent of them have left a negative feel for him. I mean, if I were him, I wouldn't do this meme at all and that I would find something else instead. I don't like it when people use their opinions as facts. I did say that I respected his opinions but he went too far by calling me a troll when I am not an Internet troll at all. It sickens to me a bit. Yes, I do know Disney is overrated, OK? Especially Frozen but that doesn't mean I don't like them.

However, I apologise for being angry in my comments to him, OK? It's just that it's not a good thing for people who use opinions as facts.